![]() Poker Copilot is the only tracking software for the Mac (that we have found), and it goes far in giving Mac users the same sort of tools that have long been available to Windows poker players who use Poker Tracker and Hold ‘Em Manager. In addition, all four leak detectors in the software are now available for tournaments, in addition to ring game support. ![]() There is simply no correct/complete way to do so, and we'd rather not give you incorrect information.Steve McLeod did a stealth update for Poker Copilot 2.4.1, an update to the online poker tracking software for Mac OS X that adds two new leak detectors, some new viewing options, and several bug fixes. This is why PokerTracker 4 does not include hands like this in the All-in Equity results. Do we do it on the turn once Player B folds? We shouldn't do that as we got our money all-in preflop and not on the turn with influenced action. Player A shows AK, the river is a T and Player A wins.Īt what point would we calculate the All-in Equity? Do we do it preflop? We don't know what Player B has and thus the calculation would be incorrect. ![]() The turn is a J, Player A bets $500 and Player B folds. The flop is KQ3, Player A bets $150 and Player B calls. Hero open shoves for $100 with QQ and both Player A and Player B call. To understand why PT4 does this, let's look at a simple example. If the players have differing stack sizes, All-in Equity actually ignores this situation. If all players have the same stack size, it is calculated as above for each player. To increase accuracy of calculation, All-in Equity ignores certain situations that PokerTracker 3 included in All-in EV calculations, this makes All-in Equity a more precise measurement of luck.įor more reading on the subject, here is an article written by Jeff Hwang on the topic of All-in EV which originally appeared in Card Player Magazine, re-hosted by permission of the author in the PokerTracker Blog. All-in Equity is a more appropriate title as it looks at the equities of the all-in hands and calculates the equity shares at that point, All-In Equity can only be calculated in scenarios where all active opponent's cards are provided in the hand history. Using the range of hands allows the player to properly project the expected value of a decision, when we are using the actual hand that an opponent holds then this projection turns into a measurement of the luck of the draw of cards to come. However, the term All-in EV is technically incorrect because EV (Expected Value) is calculated by using at the equity of our hand versus our opponent's range of hands as opposed to the exact hand they had in this situation. It is calculated by subtracting the total amount you bet from your equity in the pot. Both terms describe the calculation of what the result would be if no more cards were to be dealt and instead each player was returned their equity in the pot in all-in situations. This guide will discuss the differences between the terms, why the change was made, and how to interpret graphs which use these stats.īefore we start, we have to understand the difference between both of these terms. To replace All-In EV in PokerTracker 4, we have introduced a new concepts called "All-in Equity" and "All-In Equity Adjusted Winnings" which better represents the functionality of the stat while improving accuracy. With the advent of PokerTracker 4, we have moved away from using the terms "EV" and "All-in EV" because the terminology for these phrases are misleading, they do not truly represent Expected Value because these are results oriented stats rather than forward projecting stats. At this time, software cannot accurately determine an opponents range of possible hands, therefore EV calculation could only be performed in scenarios where all players are effectively all-in the terminology All-In EV was born from this adjustment. Expected Value is a forward projection of winnings which incorporates the range of hands that your opponent may hold. Poker players who are active in online forums often discuss the EV or Expected Value of a decision.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |